Today's "the city has a full-page express newspaper reported the shocking reports, the court summonses title is from zero to hearing litigant starry rush empty - eight hours after the ruling is not without a court-house".
This few days beforehand sees on the net, because content not exhaustive, so dare not deceptive philosophy. But today a look, surprised, because this is true, and is not fiction.
Although is reported, but the plot is full-page are very clear. In "all property for an iou", "flesh encounter" usury officeholder ""," behalf case case ", "midnight hearing" and "to the National People's Congress report the situation of secondary headlines:
The parties, 1993 ZhouXiang 190 million lend their friends, ZhouXiang is not money, made a lawsuit, Don't think in 1993 debt collection, "a porn halfway process bite gold", a "civil servant", AoHanQi usurious BeiZi mansion town, vice secretary of party WangZhiJun, one of ZhouXiang creditors. And so this a debt collection, became a "triangle case". And call dozen to 1993, finally becomes with the "wrestling, vice secretary of party".
Because there are WangZhiJun will ZhouXiang mortgaged to 1993, the company first to a "preserve" action such a link, the situation more intricate. Therefore, 1993, do not know how much of certification wronged kung fu. But I did not think, finally he dived into a trap -- midnight "ghost ShengTang".
By 2010, 29 November 1993 AoHanQi court for receiving the notice of the court summonses to take, content is to let him "zero hearing". Although this a summons let him temporarily dumbfounded, but he still on December 6 when 45 points about 23 leave home, and in 10 minutes of time, arrived at the court the door. But now, not only is the court, even around the houses of black the lamp, street is a pedestrian all have no. On 7 December 20 points at zero in custody or so, he had a few cigarette after tarry till the morning light, give up the plan.
Next, a let anyone incredible facts occurred. On December 7, 8, and when he was come again AoHanQi court, ruling has come out: "by the applicant, 1993 by subpoenaed, without justifiable reasons not to attend the hearing, so our verdict as follows: this case according to the applicant withdraws his application for dissent, 1993 automatic processing.
No comments:
Post a Comment